Sometimes, the hypocrisy is so blatant, so pronounced, very little commentary or “set up” is required.
When U.S. citizens last year were concerned that a junior Senator from Illinois with a thin voting record, and an inclination to befriend social radicals, was gaining momentum in the Presidential race, it was denounced as “hateful” rage among hotheads. But when voters in Iran take to the streets to protest the suspect “re-election” of their notoriously dictatorial President, it is embraced by Obama as “the ability of people to peacefully dissent.”
Compare and contrast. Talk among yourselves.
President Barack Hussein Obama on Iranians reacting to recent presidential election results, June 15, 2009:
“The democratic process, free speech, the ability of people to peacefully dissent — all those are universal values and need to be respected.”
Op-Ed columnist Frank Rich, NY Times, June 13, 2009:
“… There have been indications that (American citizens’) rage could spiral out of control. This was evident during the (2008) campaign, when hotheads greeted Obama’s name with “Treason!” and “Terrorist!” at G.O.P. rallies. At first the (John) McCain-(Sarah) Palin campaign fed the anger with accusations that Obama was “palling around with terrorists.”
1 response so far ↓
1 Posts about Barack Obama as of June 15, 2009 » The Daily Parr // Jun 15, 2009 at 6:02 pm
[…] voting was tallied all 17 jury members voted to indict Obama. The following criminal allegations Dissent is good — except in Obama’s backyard - theconservativesoldier.com 06/16/2009 Sometimes, the hypocrisy is so blatant, so pronounced, very […]